So I'm reading Catholic News Service today and see that an atheist is questioning retired Pope Benedict about whether or not Benedict tried to "hide the abuse".
Quote: "VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- In a letter to an atheist Italian mathematician, retired Pope Benedict XVI defended his own handling of allegations of the sexual abuse of minors by clergy and politely criticized the logician's total reliance on scientific facts for meaning.
"I never sought to conceal these things," the pope said of cases of clerical abuse, and lamented the scholar depicting the church as the only place where such "deviation" and "filth" occur.
The publication of the retired pope's comments Sept. 24 to an atheist scholar came the same month a written letter by Pope Francis to an Italian journalist concerning dialogue with nonbelievers was published. Both letters were published, with the two popes' permission, by the Italian daily La Repubblica.
The paper released long excerpts of Pope Benedict's original 11-page response to Piergiorgio Odifreddi, a prolific science writer who authored the book, "Dear Pope, I Write to You" in 2011. The book, presented as a letter to Pope Benedict, proposes the superiority of a worldview in which belief should stem only from things that can be understood and empirically known over worldviews that include belief in things that cannot be fully understood or known.
The pope's response, dated Aug. 30, thanked Odifreddi for seeking to juxtapose his ideas against the pope's own writings "and, thus, with my faith."
The pope, who has long engaged in dialogue with nonbelievers, most notably with his "Courtyard of the Gentiles" initiative and his 2011 Assisi gathering, said he appreciated Odifreddi's efforts to engage in a frank and open dialogue with the Catholic faith.
However, the pope said he met "with deep dismay" Odifreddi's unspecified comments about the clerical abuse scandals.
The pope, who was the first pontiff to meet with abuse victims, had spoken out forcefully against "the filth" in the church, clarified church laws to expedite cases, and mandated bishops' conferences put in place stringent norms against abuse, among a number of other initiatives.
In his letter, the pope said he never tried to cover up allegations.
"That the power of evil seeps all the way into the inner world of the faith is a source of suffering for us." Not only must the church bear the burden of this evil, but it also must "do everything possible so that such cases never repeat themselves," he wrote."[end]
Of course he didn't, the question is nonsense!
Apparently the atheist forgot or never learned it was Pope John Paul II who failed (for whatever reasons) to put a foot down against the abuse. Back when Pope Benedict was only a Cardinal in 1988 while JPII was Pope, Benedict was TRYING to stop it.
No one seemed to listen...and if they did they didn't act fast enough.
Pope in 1988
sought to remove abusers faster
Published December 02, 2010Associated
Press
VATICAN CITY – The Vatican on Thursday released
documentation showing Pope Benedict XVI sought as early as 1988 to find quicker
ways to permanently remove priests who raped and molested children but was
rebuffed.
A 1988 letter from then-Cardinal
Joseph Ratzinger could serve as the Vatican's best defense to date that the
future pope wanted to quickly remove pedophile priests but found himself stymied
by church law.In the letter, republished in Thursday's Vatican newspaper, Ratzinger
complained that church law made it exceedingly difficult to remove abusers if
they didn't request to be laicized voluntarily. He asked to get around the
problem by finding "a quicker and simpler procedure" than a cumbersome church
trial to punish those priests who "during their ministry were found guilty of
grave and scandalous behavior."He was turned down on the grounds
that the priests' ability to defend themselves would be compromised.
The documentation was included in an article in L'Osservatore Romano
explaining an upcoming revision of church law, which was last updated in
1983.
The article, penned by the No. 2 in the Vatican's legal office, highlighted
some of the problems and loopholes of the 1983 Code of Canon Law's
penal section that presumably will be addressed in the
revision.
The Vatican has long sought to portray Benedict as having done more than
anyone else at the Vatican to crack down on pedophile priests. But it has
usually cited as his starting point a 2001 decision to have all abuse cases sent
to his former office, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
The Feb. 19, 1988 letter
shows he sought changes far earlier given that his office was already hearing
from bishops who were having trouble dealing with
pedophiles.
Nevertheless, victims' advocates said one letter doesn't excuse decades of
inaction when police, parents and parishioners should have been notified of
abusive priests. They said nor does it excuse what they consider to be continued
inaction by the pope in removing bishops who covered up abuse.
"Since when are public figures judged by one letter in a long, long career?"
asked Joelle Casteix of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. "Since
when do words on paper count more than actual behavior?"As the clerical abuse scandal erupted earlier this year, Benedict was mired
by accusations that as prefect of the congregation, he repeatedly refused
bishops' requests to have abusers removed.
Ratzinger at the time was following laws and rules introduced by
his predecessor Pope John Paul II, which largely left punishing
such priests in the hands of local bishops, who often decided against conducting
church trials because they found them too cumbersome.John Paul had also made it tougher to leave the
priesthood, hoping to stem the tide of thousands of priests who
left in the 1970s to marry.
A consequence of that policy was that, as the priest sex abuse scandal arose
in the U.S., bishops were no longer able to sidestep the lengthy church trial
necessary for so-called laicization.Rather than conduct the church trials or report abusers to police, bishops
often moved abusers from parish to parish or sent them for counseling — actions
which later resulted in lawsuits by abuse victims that bankrupted many U.S.
dioceses.
Ratzinger's request for faster
procedures was rejected by Cardinal Jose Rosalio Castillo Lara, who headed the
Vatican commission responsible for implementing the 1983 code.
In a March 10, 1988 letter to Ratzinger, Castillo Lara said simplifying
the procedures "would endanger the fundamental right of defense" of the
priest while straying from the church's legal-based system, according to the
letter reprinted in L'Osservatore.
In the end — amid the explosion of abuse cases in the United States and more
recently Europe — the Vatican
in 2001, 2003 and most recently this summer took steps to streamline and formalize norms
so that abusive priests could be removed quickly without a church
trial.
The Rev. Davide Cito, a canon lawyer at Rome's Pontifical Holy Cross
University, said the 1983 code was problematic both in that it left it
largely up to bishops to decide whether to intervene and at the same time
discouraged them from taking tough action against abusers.
"What they want to do now is to make a penal law that is applied seriously,
that will be more concrete and obligatory" for bishops, he said.
Monsignor Juan Ignacio Arrieta, the No. 2 in the Vatican's legal department,
said that in the coming weeks proposals for revisions of the penal part of the
code will be sent to Vatican consultants and advisers.No date has been set for publication of the changes, which have been under
study for two years.Nick Cafardi, a canon lawyer who detailed the problems American bishops
encountered in trying to deal with abusive priests in his book "Before Dallas,"
noted that the penal part of the 1983 code didn't undergo any "trial" period
after it was issued.
"It went right from the drafters to being effective law - and therefore had
no time to have the bumps worked out," Cafardi said in an e-mail. "And obviously
there were bumps - so many that the American bishops threw up their hands and
chose not to use the canonical penal process to deal with these
priests."
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TODAY: A
MODEL FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN
FACT: The Catholic Church is likely the safest
environment for children today.
The Catholic Church's record of aggressive and
proactive protective measures is unparalleled in any organization today.
Since the beginning of the abuse crisis, the Catholic Church:
- has instituted a "zero tolerance" policy in which any credibly accused
priest is immediately removed from ministry. Law enforcement is also
notified;
- has trained over 5 million children in giving them skills to protect them
from abuse;
- has trained over 2 million adults, including 99 percent of all priests, in
recognizing signs of abuse;
- has conducted over 2 million background checks, including those in the
intensified screening process for aspiring seminarians and priests;
- has installed "Victim Assistance Coordinators" in every diocese, "assuring
victims that they will be heard";
- has instituted in all dioceses abuse review boards – often composed of child
welfare experts, child psychologists, and abuse experts – to examine any claims
of abuse against priests.
No other organization even comes close to implementing the measures
the Catholic Church has taken to protect children in its care. In this regard,
the Catholic Church in the 21st century is the model for other institutions to
follow in the safeguarding of youth.
source: http://www.themediareport.com/fast-facts/
In Christ,
Julie @ Connecticut Catholic Corner
No comments:
Post a Comment
This is a Catholic blog, please keep your comments respectful to my Faith even when you disagree.
Profanity will not be tolerated - it will be DELETED, so do not waste your time or mine.
Thank you and God bless...
Julie @ Connecticut Catholic Corner