The Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines has
voiced its support for an “anti-discrimination” law to not treat lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender people as “second-class” citizens. But what “rights” exactly are the Bishops supporting
for LGBT people so they no longer feel like they are being treated as second
class citizens?
Tell me I'm wrong, but it looks to me that the CBCP is supporting gay rights in a roundabout way...
Quote: “MANILA, Philippines – The Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) said it supports a proposed anti-discrimination law as long as it rejects second-class treatment for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community. The CBCP, however, said it cannot encourage choosing one's gender and performing homosexual acts, among other things. It explained that gender and sexuality “must be counted as God’s gift.” The CBCP also asserted its “exclusive right” to choose priests “even on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.”“Insofar as the proposed piece of legislation renders illegitimate the relegation of persons with sexual orientation and gender identity issues to citizens of a lower category enjoying fewer rights, the CBCP cannot but lend its support to this proposed legislative measure,” CBCP president Lingayen-Dagupan Archbishop Socrates Villegas said in a statement Tuesday, March 3.Villegas said an anti-discrimination law is a “gesture of charity” if discrimination means “that certain individuals, because of sexual orientation or gender identity, are systematically denied fundamental human rights.” He then urged priests to care for all, including the LGBT community, and warned parents against imbuing in children “the loathing and disgust” for the LGBT. He instructed Catholic schools, for their part, to implement a “zero-tolerance” policy against “the bullying and badgering of persons in such personal situations.”Villegas explained that treating the members of the LGBT community as outcasts “certainly does not conform to Pope Francis’ vision of the Church as the sacrament of divine mercy and compassion.”“Persons with homosexual orientation are sons and daughters of God; no less than any of us is. Discrimination against them is contrary to the Gospel spirit. Verbal and physical violence against them is an offense against the good Lord Himself,” the archbishop said. Villegas issued this statement as the anti-discrimination bill passed the committee level at the House of Representatives on February 11. This means congressmen can begin to debate on the bill in the plenary.The bill “seeks to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity,” the bill's principal author, Dinagat Islands Representative Kaka Bag-ao, said in a statement.” -End quote-
Some interesting wording that I am sure will be seen
differently by different people. Let’s
start with “lower category enjoying fewer rights”.
What “rights” exactly do homosexuals legally
need that they don’t already have? They have
the right to live, food, shelter, to work, join the military, own property, go
to school, vote, have a career…what rights are they missing that make them feel
“discriminated” against?
Oh yes… MARRIAGE!!
The Bishops here are either being completely naïve or
extremely deceptive. The Philippines is
ranked one of THE MOST GAY FRIENDLY places in the WORLD. Certainly no one is advocating verbal or physical violence against homosexuals and since the Philippines is ranked as one of the top 10 gay friendly places in the entire world, then what "discrimination" are they suffering?
If the Philippines are so “gay friendly”, then what is the
reason for this anti-discrimination law? What's left?
Marriage.
It’s the only “right” they claim they are lacking. So this is all about gay marriage and activists [in my opinion] are using the Philippine Bishops to push their gay agenda under the mantle of "charity" and ending "discrimination".
What about Archbishop Villegas’ statement “systematically denied
fundamental human rights”? What’s that supposed
to mean? Are they denied the right to
food? Shelter? Jobs?
To own property? To vote? No, they are not. They have ALL those rights, just like other
citizens.
What's missing? Marriage.
The Vatican has made it quite clear the Church can not and will not recognize any gay unions.
So once more I ask, what “fundamental human right” is the CBCP talking
about, that homosexuals currently don’t have in the Philippines if not marriage which the Church cannot and will not support?
And what's that last crack about treating LGBT's like "outcasts" [who exactly is doing that and how will this law change it?] and Pope Francis' view for the Church? How are they being treated like "outcasts" in one of the most gay friendly places in the entire world?
I wish Archbishop Villegas would have specified exactly what
he was talking about.
In Christ,
Julie @ Connecticut Catholic Corner
Link photo image: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/politics/130607/the-20-most-and-least-gay-friendly-countries-the-world
+Villegas may not specifically understand what he and those who behave in such was are talking about:
ReplyDeleteThe Church's ultimate trial
CCC 675 Before Christ's second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers.574 The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth 575 will unveil the "mystery of iniquity" in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. The supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the flesh.576
*****
Please note, Julie, the particular line stating, "...the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth."
That's why, at the risk of being a broken record, I say again that the vague and ambiguous and 'pastoral' that is being systematically embedded in Church doctrine by way of slippery language needs to be called out and either clarified or removed. The why being such language infers the conclusions that you yourself have just drawn regarding +Villegas inane and wide-open-barn-door speech.
Such inferences in teaching documents are a red flag danger to souls as it gives the green light to crank the fire on beneath the pot of frogs. The frogs being us. Some will jump out, some will try to turn off the burner themselves (clinging to the outside of the pot while attempting to right the control, if not by themselves then by eliciting some measure of pity on the cook who is supposed to love/care for the frogs, and still others will just boil.
...and now we've got the wholesale twisting of the washing of the Apostles feet. Complete with inferences. Actions and symbols teach people regardless of what words say. And those managing the frogs know that or, if not, are taught by having their own burners cranked on.
Thank you again for blogging about the disgusting fruit of a cancer that just keeps giving. For the only "outcasts" will soon be those who believe in the Catholic Faith as handed down.
A good point to be made about true unity in FAITH:
ReplyDeletehttp://angelqueen.org/2015/03/06/the-sspx-schism-ewtn-vs-cmtv/
Time for Catholic folks who love the fullness of Faith to work together to fight the evils outlined so diligently in Julie's blog!
Thank you for your comments Patty.
ReplyDeleteGod bless.