There is a brouhaha brewing among some defenders of the
Catholic faith as to whether or not a Catholic should ever criticize a pope.
Michael Voris of Church MilitantTV has produced a (what some are calling) “manifesto” on his website declaring
that Church MilitantTV would NOT criticize Pope Francis for anything he says
because good or bad a pope is a pope, the Vicar of Christ on earth.
Voris is apparently responding to the outcry
from Catholics who are clearly worried about some of the actions and words of our
current Pope. The common consensus seems
to be that if a mere Bishop said or did some of the things Pope Francis has
said or done they would be fair game for Mr. Voris to rip to shreds on his
Vortex show. But because it is the Pope saying
and doing these things, Voris is perhaps being hypocritical. Is he?
Let’s take a look at what is being said by whom…
“…Francis the Reformer seems to have noticed only one
element of the Church in need of immediate, drastic reform: “the self-absorbed
promethean neopelagianism of those who ultimately trust only in their own
powers and feel superior to others because they observe certain rules or remain
intransigently faithful to a particular Catholic style from the past.” (Evangelii Gaudium 94). In other words,
traditional Roman Catholicism. Hence the Pope’s brutal dismantling of the
Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate on account of what his apostolic
commissioner calls “crypto-Lefebvrianism and a definite traditionalist drift.” –end
quote-
“What is one to
think of the Pope’s Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (EG)? In a document of 50,000 words spanning 223 typeset pages—straining the
hortatory genre beyond all reasonable limits—one would naturally expect to find
a good deal of orthodox Catholicism; and that is there. Francis is, after all,
the Pope, even if he doesn’t like to call himself that and refuses to add the
traditional pontifical “P.P.” to his signature on this or any other document.
Then
again, in a document of this length one would also expect to find a good deal
of what has made this Pope so beloved by the worldwide mass media:
radical-sounding bombshells about how wrong the Church is and how much Francis
must do to make it right, in all humility. That too is there—in spades. And no,
I am not referring to EG’s emphasis on love of
neighbor and concern for the poor, or its biting commentary on globalist
capitalism and the idolatry of money. Such things may be pleasing to liberals
of a socialist bent, but they are also entirely consistent with the social
teaching of a long line of Popes before and after Vatican II. And please spare
me the dudgeon of fat and happy faux conservatives who are
just liberals of the bourgeois variety. They “have no problem with gays” or
even abortion so long as it is legalized according to “states’ rights,” but
utter a peep against capitalism and they begin barking like trained seals about
capitalist abundance and Third World poverty, failing to notice that capitalist
abundance depends upon Third World wage slaves, so that Third World poverty
actually proves the Church’s point about the moral deficiencies of capitalist
social order. To decry those deficiencies, as the Popes have always done, is
not to advocate socialism.” –end quote-
John Vennari of Catholic Family news also criticized the
Pope by calling him “The Martini Pope”- a reference to the late and very
controversial liberal Cardinal Martini. Martini has a long list of “issues”
that clearly go against official Catholic teaching, yet he was a darling of
Pope Francis’ and that makes/made many Catholics nervous.
Vennari quote: “The media praised Martini
as an “open-minded thinker,” one who “struck an original note in Church
affairs.”[1]
What were some of Martini’s radical ideas?
In his last interview, which Martini asked to be published after his death,
Martini said the Catholic Church is “200 years behind the times”.
Martini further said, ”Our culture has grown old, our churches and our
religious houses are big and empty, the bureaucratic apparatus of the Church
grows, our rites and our dress are pompous.”
Martini encouraged opening up reception of the Eucharist for the divorced and
remarried Catholics, counseling against what he called “discrimination.”[2]
In the book Night Conversation with Cardinal Martini published in 2010,
Martini insisted, “You can’t make God a Catholic God. God is beyond all the
barriers and borders we create.”[3]
In the same book, speaking of dialogue with non-Catholics, Cardinal Martini
said that once you talk frankly with members of various other religions, “You
will even be glad that the other person is a Protestant or Muslim”.[4]
Martini acknowledged the German and Austrian Bishops’ dissent from Humanae Vitae, as “pointing to a
direction that we could promote today.”[5]
Martini called for a more collegial and synodal approach to Church governance.[6]
In 2007, “when the 16th Century Tridentine Mass was introduced as
an option for Roman Catholic churches, Martini said he would refuse to
celebrate it.”[7]
Yet Pope Francis, on the first anniversary of the Cardinal’s death, publicly
praised Martini as “a father for the whole Church”.
Francis went on to call Martini a “prophetic” figure, and “a man of discernment
and peace” –end quote-
“Faithful Catholics need help in persevering through their anxieties and
doubts, not continual reinforcement and encouragement of those troubling
states. Less faithful Catholics form their judgments of "traditional
Catholics" through the lens of perceived dissatisfaction and unhappiness
with the Church and the Holy Father. Those who relentlessly criticize the
Church, Her leaders, and especially the Holy Father, do immense harm to the
Church Herself and discourage both potential converts and those struggling to
stay faithful through the crisis that is all around us. The sad reputation of
"traditional Catholics" as angry dissidents from virtually everything
in the Church today is as well deserved as the reputations of those rightly
described as modernists. A line must be drawn when it comes to criticism of the Holy Father, even
when he says or does things that would invite appropriate criticism when said
or done by those of lower ecclesiastical rank. Errant priests and bishops can
be replaced. The Pope cannot. It may make us cringe at times but it always was
and always will be true that ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia. There have been
extraordinarily awful Popes in the past but, for all that, the Church not only
survived but thrived. The Popes immediately before, during and after the
Protestant Revolt showed little recognition or understanding of the catastrophe
unfolding before them (not unlike the post-conciliar Popes of our own time)
yet, from such unpromising soil emerged an astonishing number of great Saints,
and the Council of Trent.”
(Well done Louie, well done)
So is it hypocrisy?
On the surface it looks that way, but I don’t think Michael Voris is being a
hypocrite at all. Voris, with his Church
MilitantTV Internet media outlet has clearly defined in their statement what
they would and would not do. They have
drawn a line in the sand, saying the Pope is off limits because he IS the Vicar
of Christ on earth and because they respect that position, they will not
disrespect it by criticizing anyone sitting in the Chair of Peter.
From Church Militant website:
“ChurchMilitant.TV will not engage in public
criticism of the Pope. Period.”
Fine. There is
nothing wrong with that. Every Catholic
knows there have been good and bad Popes throughout history. Voris and his team
have decided their own perimeters are anyone in the world is fair game but the
pope (whoever he may be) is off limits. Voris
will criticize Cardinals, Bishops, people within the Vatican and the running of
the Vatican, but not the Pope.
By that same token, other Catholics have the right to decide who or what
they feel comfortable criticizing. These
other Catholics (including myself) appear to have decided ANYONE and EVERYONE is “fair game” for
criticism in the defense of defending the Faith. If there is a bad pope, let him be
criticized for his words and/or actions if they are in error or causing error to spread.
We’ve got a history of
Saints who had no problem criticizing a pope and telling them what needed saying. Namely Saint Catherine of Siena who wrote to
Pope Gregory XI:
“Since [Christ] has given you authority and you have accepted
it, you ought to be using the power and strength that is yours. If you
don’t intend to use it, it would be better and more to God’s honor and the good
of your soul to resign….If I were in your place, I would be afraid of incurring
divine judgment.” Later in her letter she continued, “Cursed be
you, for time and power were entrusted to you and you did not use them!” –end quote-
My suggestion to everyone: RELAX!
We all LOVE our Faith and want to defend it. And we should!
I think ALL of these Catholic men are SPOT ON! Ferrara and Vennari are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT in
what they said. They shared FACTS. We don’t like those facts, but they are
indeed facts. These things happened and are happening in our Church today. The Pope has said and done things they have
caused “issues” and fear to ripple through the Church. Fact.
He’s not the first and he may not be the last one to do this.
So Voris is no Saint Catherine of Siena, so what? There are many GOOD Catholic voices out there
defending the faith – support them, right?
Ahh… but there is the rub as Verrecchio pointed out. Voris is calling OUT people who are
criticizing the Pope. Would Voris have
called out Saint Catherine of Siena too?
My guess…yes. Voris is clearly
uncomfortable with people criticizing the Vicar of Christ.
SHOULD Voris point his finger at people who find criticism
with a pope?
That is the real question here and it’s not an easy one to
answer. We have clear examples of Saints
who have no issue criticizing anyone within the Church, even a pope.
"If the
faith is in imminent peril, prelates ought to be accused by their subjects,
even in public." -St. Thomas Aquinas
So what’s a Catholic to do? Be careful; be very careful because we WILL
be judged by not only our actions but our words.
Personally, I think Voris has
personally decided to err on the side of extreme caution when it comes to the
Vicar of Christ. He is not willing to
jeopardize his salvation or perhaps lengthen his time in purgatory to call out
a pope. If Voris’ conscience is telling
him to “leave the Seat of Peter alone” then Voris is 100% correct in avoiding
what might lead him to sin.
Catherine of Siena apparently had
no qualms criticizing a pope.
God uses us all differently.
Respect and recognize that fact,
then love and defend our Faith in the ways you are called. In the end, we will all be judged by our own
actions, in-actions and words.
In Christ,
Julie @ Connecticut Catholic Corner
